BLOG

Why Pigeon Breeding Still Relies on Belief Rather Than Proof

In the pigeon world, certain ideas have been repeated for decades.
Handling, appearance, eye sign, “feel.”
They are often spoken of as if they offer reliable confirmation of quality.

But a very simple question challenges this belief:

If a pigeon’s ability could truly be confirmed
by sight or by touch alone,
why would breeding still be necessary at all?

If such clear evidence existed,
everyone would be selecting the same superior birds.
Results would have levelled out long ago.
In theory, everyone should be breeding champions.

That, of course, is not what we see.

Even with similar bloodlines, management, and environments,
outcomes differ—often dramatically.
This alone suggests that the decisive factors
cannot be fully identified through observation or handling.

Handling and appearance offer information, not proof

Body structure, muscle tone, and balance
can certainly provide useful information.
But they do not guarantee performance.

Anyone who has handled truly elite racing pigeons
knows that dramatic or exaggerated physical sensations
are not consistently present.

When something cannot be clearly explained or verified,
it is often replaced with a story.
Repeated often enough, that story becomes accepted as fact.

Why these stories persist

There is an uncomfortable reason why such beliefs endure.

Knowledge and analysis threaten established advantage.

Once performance is discussed in terms of
genetics, physiology, conditions, and environment,
that understanding becomes accessible to anyone willing to study.

By contrast, phrases like
“you can’t explain it” or
“you have to feel it”
preserve authority through experience alone.

In that sense, uncertainty can feel safer than clarity.
It protects hierarchy.

Breeding is not faith—it is accumulated observation

Pigeon breeding does not progress through intuition alone.
It advances through repetition, failure, and long-term observation.

If excellence were truly visible and tangible at first glance,
breeding would no longer be a challenge.
It would be routine.

The fact that it is not
is precisely why breeding remains both difficult and meaningful.

Recognising this is not a loss of tradition—
it is the beginning of understanding.